"If a foreign country bombed our air defense missiles, captured and removed our president, and blockaded our country, would that be considered an act of war? Paul asked Rubio. The senator acknowledged Maduro could be guilty of the crimes he's charged with and that his election victory has been likely rightfully challenged by other countries, including the U.S., but argued he was indicted under foreign laws, making his capture more than a law enforcement action."
"I will acknowledge you've been very consistent on all these points the entire career, no matter who's in charge. So I will point to two things. The first is it's hard for us to conceive that an operation that lasted about four and a half hours and was a law enforcement operation to capture someone we don't recognize as a head of state indicted in the United States, Rubio said."
Legal and diplomatic implications of a foreign indictment and seizure of a U.S. president were examined via a hypothetical comparing President Trump to Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro. Maduro was indicted in the United States in 2020 on narco-terrorism charges and is facing trial in New York. The scenario contrasted a foreign operation to capture an indicted leader with U.S. law enforcement actions and noted that an unauthorized foreign capture could be seen as more than law enforcement and potentially as hostilities. Contexts such as recognition of leadership, the indictment's origin, and the operation's scope affect perceptions of an act of war.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]