The federal SNAP program, established in 1939 to combat food insecurity, faces potential budget cuts as Congress considers a new proposal requiring states to fund a portion of the program. Starting in 2028, states may need to pay 5 to 25 percent of SNAP benefits, alongside increased administrative costs. This shift could pressure states to restrict eligibility for benefits which have traditionally been federally funded. Critics argue that this move threatens to adversely affect millions reliant on SNAP while supporting Republican goals of budget savings tied to extending tax cuts.
The new budget bill proposed by the House Agriculture Committee would require states to contribute to SNAP funding, potentially leading to reduced benefits for millions.
Experts warn that forcing states to partially fund SNAP could exacerbate food insecurity and strain local budgets, impacting food producers and retailers.
House Republicans argue that requiring states to pay part of SNAP benefits is necessary for achieving federal savings, linking it to tax cuts and budgetary goals.
If enacted, the changes could force significant budgetary shifts in 28 states and territories, impacting nearly 42 million SNAP recipients nationwide.
Collection
[
|
...
]