The 3-0 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit emphasized that while some firearm bans in California and Hawaii upheld the Constitution, others were more ambiguous and could not be justified under current Supreme Court interpretations.
The Ninth Circuit judges noted that while California could impose bans on firearms in sensitive locations like parks and bars, restrictions in areas like banks and hospitals were not automatically deemed permissible, reflecting the ongoing tension of firearm regulation in the United States.
[
Collection
]
[
|
...
]