There’s a profound disconnect in the discourse when Bill Ackman dismisses allegations regarding Donald Trump’s views on Hitler, despite credible witnesses flagging such claims.
Mika Brzezinski questions the rationale behind Ackman’s defense, suggesting that as a successful individual he’s undermining the seriousness of Trump’s alleged comments.
Andrew Sorkin points out that Ackman's defense stems from a belief that Kamala Harris lacks the competence necessary to lead, showcasing a prioritization over the truth of Trump’s statements.
The conversation reflects a broader theme among some wealthy individuals who prioritize political affiliations over ethical considerations, challenging their credibility and the morality of their stance.
Collection
[
|
...
]