Chief Justice John Roberts has prioritized advancing Donald Trump's political and legal ambitions, compromising his judicial integrity and abandoning a moderate, consensus-driven approach.
Roberts ignored valid objections to Trump's eligibility under the 14th Amendment, opting for a controversial ruling, which led to a fracture among the justices.
By sidelining Justice Samuel Alito from a significant case, Roberts ensured that he could present a ruling that favored January 6 rioters and minimized the court's partisanship.
Roberts' decisions have granted Trump unforeseen immunity, signaling a shift away from consensus-building toward extreme MAGA positions, challenging the narrative of Roberts as a moderate.
Collection
[
|
...
]