Lost in the Halftime Controversy Is One Undeniable Truth: Kid Rock SUCKS
Briefly

Lost in the Halftime Controversy Is One Undeniable Truth: Kid Rock SUCKS
"But buried beneath his recent reclaim of relevance is one widely accepted truth: he f*cking sucks. This has nothing to do with his politics. He can vote however he wants and believe whatever he wants. The problem is simpler and deeper than that. He's a rich kid pretending to be something he's not, making terrible music, and selling it to an audience that deserves better than being pandered to by someone who wouldn't recognize their lives if he tripped over them."
"Kid Rock was born Robert James Ritchie in 1971 and raised in Romeo, Michigan, a comfortable suburban town outside Detroit. His father owned multiple successful car dealerships. The family lived on a large estate with a horse barn, an apple orchard, and an in-ground pool. This was not a household scraping by, as his catalog of music might suggest. This was money, space, stability, and options. Ritchie grew up with every opportunity and exit available to him."
Kid Rock maintains a high-profile presence at Trump-era rallies and conservative events as a symbol of cultural relevance. The public persona centers on a trailer-park outlaw and redneck bravado that does not reflect his upbringing. He was raised in suburban affluence with family wealth, space, and opportunities, contrasting sharply with the working-class image he projects. The musical output is described as poor quality and crafted for an audience that is being pandered to rather than genuinely represented. Conservative media celebrate the symbolic value of the performance more than its artistic merit.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]