Would Parents Rather Work Remote for $120K or In Office for $240K? The Internet Is Divided

"I had at least one child home sick three out of five days this week. But because I can work remotely, it didn't dramatically throw my day off track. If I had to report to work in an office, however, I might have had to use PTO to cover those days. In the years since the COVID-19 pandemic, parents have appreciated and craved remote work. But how much is the flexibility to care for sick kids, attend in-school events and eliminate commuting time worth"

"Content creator Christina Najjar, known on TikTok as Tinx, posed a fascinating question on Dec. 9: Would you accept a job that pays $120,000 to be fully remote, or $240,000 to go into the office? The video has been viewed by over 5 million people in 10 days. For Najjar, the answer is clear. She would take the higher salary and spend time in the office. Comments were extremely divided and very passionate:"

Remote-work flexibility allowed a parent to manage children sick at home without major work disruption, avoiding PTO and commuting. Since the COVID-19 pandemic many parents value remote work for caregiving, in-school events, and time savings. Content creator Christina Najjar asked whether people would take $120,000 fully remote or $240,000 in-office, sparking millions of views and polarized responses. Some prioritize higher salary and office presence; others prioritize mental health and flexibility. A commenter noted single workers might prefer higher pay while working parents might choose remote pay. Personal finance expert Ashley Feinstein Gerstley notes parents have thrived with remote flexibility and use breaks for household or child tasks.

Read at TODAY.com