Why the WADA appeal into Jannik Sinner doping case cuts to the heart of anti-doping priorities
Briefly

The debate surrounding Jannik Sinner's doping case underscores the complexities of anti-doping regulations, particularly when holders of integrity question athlete culpability despite rule breaches.
While the ITIA acknowledged Sinner's positive results as violations, their conclusion of no fault suggests a nuanced outlook on culpability in doping cases that challenges existing anti-doping protocols.
Read at www.nytimes.com
[
]
[
|
]