James Yates reviewed numerous internal disciplinary cases related to stop-and-frisk violations and found that penalties for such misconduct are rare, undermining constitutional standards.
Yates indicated that the NYPD penalizes illegal stops and frisks less rigorously than other misconduct, suggesting a pattern of leniency towards these violations.
The NYPD's disciplinary response allows minor infractions to be resolved at the precinct level without serious consequences, which diminishes accountability within the department.
The reluctance of NYPD commissioners to impose strict discipline on illegal stops and searches in the name of 'good faith' suggests systemic issues with constitutional adherence.
[
Collection
]
[
|
...
]