EFF Tells Virginia Court That Constitutional Privacy Protections Forbid Cops from Finding out Everyone Who Searched for a Keyword
Briefly

Search engines hold significant information about users' private queries, and police are increasingly accessing this data. The case Commonwealth v. Clements highlights the concerns around reverse-keyword warrants, which compel search engines like Google to disclose information about users based on keyword searches. This method poses serious threats to privacy and free speech by capturing data on individuals uninvolved in criminal activity. Investigators typically do not focus on specific suspects, leading to an expansive and invasive collection of data that undermines constitutional protections.
The Virginia appeals court is reviewing a reverse-keyword warrant case, Commonwealth v. Clements, which raises serious privacy concerns regarding police access to search engine queries.
Reverse keyword warrants compel search engines to provide information about everyone who searched a particular term, infringing upon privacy, free speech, and inquiry.
A keyword warrant requires search engines to scan billions of user queries, capturing individuals unrelated to any crime, compromising their privacy.
Investigators often have no specific suspect in mind when seeking reverse-keyword warrants, creating a broad dragnet that can violate rights.
Read at Electronic Frontier Foundation
[
|
]