Judge Denies Trump's Third Request to Remove Him From Criminal Case
Briefly

Justice Merchan, who has no direct ties to Ms. Harris, slammed Mr. Trump's filing seeking his recusal as rife with inaccuracies and repetitive. He emphasized the ethical standards that ensure impartiality in his decision-making, noting that his daughter's associations do not compromise his ability to oversee the trial fairly. This dismissal of Trump's claims reinforces the integrity of the judicial process and highlights the role of judicial ethics in maintaining public trust.
Prosecutors characterized Trump's request for the judge's recusal as a vexatious and frivolous attempt to relitigate matters that had already been settled in court. This assertion emphasizes the challenges faced in legal disputes where the credibility of claims may be questioned. The legal team's perseverance in frustrating this request indicates a commitment to uphold procedural integrity, pushing back against what they perceive as strategic delays in the judicial process.
Read at www.nytimes.com
[
|
]