"The case, Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, is being closely watched by civil rights groups who argue that valid workplace discrimination claims are often dismissed in court because of a requirement that plaintiffs prove they were harmed by the actions of their employers."
"The case is being watched by employment attorneys and some conservatives who say a broad ruling for Muldrow could open the door to a flood of reverse discrimination claims against certain workplace diversity, equity and inclusion programs - such as mentoring and training programs for underrepresented groups - that ordinarily would not survive in court."
"The Supreme Court is going to address a very fundamental aspect of Title VII, namely: What does it cover? What is actionable under Title VII?"
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]