The article addresses the rhetoric of unpredictability and argues that "there is significant reason to think the popular narrative that § 101 and the Mayo/ Alice framework cannot be predictably applied, particularly by judges, may be more of a misconception than an accurate narrative."
For folks fighting through eligibility cases these days, the biggest concern is no longer unpredictability, but that the law has pushed too far against patentability.
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]