Sir Antony Gormley, alongside Vicken Parsons, emphasized that the proposals threaten the integrity of Coal Drops Yard, lamenting the potential transformation into mundane shopping streets. They argue that this change would destroy the unique aesthetic and historic value of the site, advocating instead for solutions that honor its architecture and cultural significance. Their concerns reflect a broader apprehension among locals regarding the safeguarding of King's Cross's distinctive character amidst rapid development.
Anthea Harries, representing Related Argent, insists that the development is essential for the evolving nature of the King's Cross community. She articulates that the need to adapt the site for a variety of retail options is crucial for meeting the desires of residents, workers, and visitors, aiming to keep the area vibrant and relevant. The contrast between Harries' vision and Gormley’s artistic perspective underscores the tension between development and preservation in urban spaces.
[
Collection
]
[
|
...
]