The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court's ruling that a patent for multimedia systems interoperability was abstract and ineligible. DirectPacket Research's infringement suit against Polycom was dismissed after the district court found the claims merely described language translation without demonstrating an inventive concept. The appeals court sided with the lower court, asserting that the claims lacked specific details required for patent eligibility under the Alice framework. The CAFC noted that claim limitations did not significantly differentiate the claims, thus supporting the ruling for abstraction.
The CAFC held that directPacket's patent claims did not improve device interoperability functionality, deeming them too abstract and general to qualify for eligibility.
In affirming the district court's decision, the CAFC concluded that the claims did not define any specific method to enhance the interoperability of multimedia systems.
Collection
[
|
...
]