Nato's failure to save Ukraine raises an existential question: what on earth is it for? | Simon Tisdall
Briefly

NATO should have intervened robustly to deter Russia's aggression right from the start, as repeatedly urged here...No-fly zones could have prevented thousands of civilian casualties and limited damage to Ukraine's cities.
General Richard Shirreff urges a fundamental shift to a more activist strategy, emphasizing the need for a stronger stance against Putin's actions.
Read at www.theguardian.com
[
]
[
|
]