Opinion: How to design a US data privacy law
Briefly

The GDPR is often dismissed as a mere "bureaucratic headache," but this view is outdated and fails to recognize the significant implications of ignoring its principles.
Critics of GDPR often face skepticism, as many believe the law is still too young for evaluation, and some suspect authors of having ties to Big Tech.
Ignoring the GDPR's flaws can have costly repercussions, as evidenced by severe penalties imposed on companies, revealing the regulatory environment's serious nature.
To establish a robust privacy regime, the US must consider both the conceptual flaws of the GDPR recognized by its architects and the necessary design requirements.
Read at Ars Technica
[
]
[
|
]