The trial revealed generative AI's summary capabilities are significantly inferior to human capabilities, with scores of 47% for AI versus 81% for human summaries.
Using Meta's Llama2-70B model, the AI struggled to meet the expectations set for summarizing documents, casting doubt on its practical applications in business.
The findings highlight a prevalent concern about generative AI's reliability, raising questions about its utility for most organizations in workplace settings.
Evaluators in the trial reported a strong perception of the AI outputs, confirming the challenges in distinguishing between human and AI-generated summaries.
#generative-ai #summarization #human-vs-ai #australian-securities-and-investment-commission #meta-llama2
[
Collection
]
[
|
...
]