The AI Act has been viewed as a potential model for global regulation, yet evidence suggests that US states are not adopting these EU rules as anticipated. Lobbying from big tech has had a pronounced effect.
Current evidence does not support the notion of a 'Brussels effect' in AI legislation, as state lawmakers are influenced by lobbying from tech companies pushing for regulations that favor industry over public protections.
Unlike the sweeping nature of the AI Act, state-level legislation in the US tends to focus narrowly, often eschewing many crucial protective measures in favor of minimizing compliance costs.
The disparity in legislative approaches highlights a critical junction for AI governance, where state legislators may prioritize industry lobbying over establishing robust protections for individuals and social rights.
[
Collection
]
[
|
...
]