@PatentBuddy

Is there any action performed by the supreme court that has not been bought with a bribe?
We don't know: Supreme Court Dodges AI Inventor Question with Denial of DABUS Case

Intellectual property law

IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
Supreme Court Dodges AI Inventor Question with Denial of DABUS Case
"It is now up to Congress to decide whether to change the law to allow inventions to be protected regardless of how AI is used in the inventive process, and to help the US maintain its position as a world leader in innovation." - Professor Ryan Abbott
One day before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is set to hold its first public listening session on AI inventorship, the U.S. Supreme Court today denied certiorari in the case of Thaler v. Vidal, which asked the Court to consider the question: "Does the Patent Act categorically restrict the statutory term 'inventor' to human beings alone?"
[ post ]