A judge who overturned a $72 million verdict against Boeing disclosed he bought and sold Boeing stock while hearing the case - but says his wife's IRA was to blame
Judge Robart's stock trades during an ongoing case raise potential ethical conflicts.
The implications of judges' financial activities are under increased scrutiny.
Supreme Court Justices Aren't The Only Ones Failing To Report Lavish Trips
Dozens of federal judges failed to disclose luxury travel, highlighting a lack of transparency and potential conflicts of interest.
A judge who overturned a $72 million verdict against Boeing disclosed he bought and sold Boeing stock while hearing the case - but says his wife's IRA was to blame
Judge Robart's stock trades during an ongoing case raise potential ethical conflicts.
The implications of judges' financial activities are under increased scrutiny.
Supreme Court Justices Aren't The Only Ones Failing To Report Lavish Trips
Dozens of federal judges failed to disclose luxury travel, highlighting a lack of transparency and potential conflicts of interest.
Senate confirms 200th federal judge under Biden as Democrats surpass Trump's pace
Biden administration confirmed 200 federal judges with diverse nominations, despite starting with fewer vacancies than Trump.
Senate's confirmation pace reflects the focus and importance placed on judicial confirmations by Biden and Schumer.
Democratic state attorneys general sue Biden administration over abortion pill rules
Mifepristone was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2000 to induce first-trimester abortions in combination with a second drug, misoprostol.Charlie Neibergall/AP A coalition of state attorneys general is suing the Food and Drug Administration, accusing the agency of excessively regulating the abortion pill mifepristone.
Student-loan borrowers on Biden's new repayment plan get a win after a federal court rules that cheaper monthly payments can go into effect
Federal judges blocked parts of student loan repayment plan, Biden granted stay for new provisions, uncertainty remains for borrowers.
Judges Upended Biden's Student Loan Repayment Plan. What Happens Now?
Biden's student loan repayment plan faces legal hurdles with temporary blockage of benefits by federal judges.
Judges halt much of Biden's student loan forgiveness plan
The Biden administration's student loan repayment plan faced significant obstacles as federal judges in Kansas and Missouri blocked key aspects, hindering assistance to borrowers.
Senate confirms 200th federal judge under Biden as Democrats surpass Trump's pace
Biden administration confirmed 200 federal judges with diverse nominations, despite starting with fewer vacancies than Trump.
Senate's confirmation pace reflects the focus and importance placed on judicial confirmations by Biden and Schumer.
Democratic state attorneys general sue Biden administration over abortion pill rules
Mifepristone was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2000 to induce first-trimester abortions in combination with a second drug, misoprostol.Charlie Neibergall/AP A coalition of state attorneys general is suing the Food and Drug Administration, accusing the agency of excessively regulating the abortion pill mifepristone.
Student-loan borrowers on Biden's new repayment plan get a win after a federal court rules that cheaper monthly payments can go into effect
Federal judges blocked parts of student loan repayment plan, Biden granted stay for new provisions, uncertainty remains for borrowers.
Judges Upended Biden's Student Loan Repayment Plan. What Happens Now?
Biden's student loan repayment plan faces legal hurdles with temporary blockage of benefits by federal judges.
Judges halt much of Biden's student loan forgiveness plan
The Biden administration's student loan repayment plan faced significant obstacles as federal judges in Kansas and Missouri blocked key aspects, hindering assistance to borrowers.
"The only meaningful remedy is vacatur of the relevant decisions and reconsideration by a newly constituted impartial PTAB panel free of financial conflicts."One day after U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal testified during a hearing before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet, Centripetal Networks filed a reply in support of its petition for a writ of mandamus in its patent dispute with Cisco.
PTAB Finds Centripetal's Recusal Arguments 'Frivolous' and 'Baseless,' Warns About Sanctions for Future Attacks
"[T]he Board pointed to language in cases cited by Centripetal indicating that recusal is only required when the financial interest is 'substantial...' [B]ecause APJ McNamara's financial interests met the de minimis exception, they were 'remote' and 'inconsequential' and therefore could not have been 'substantial.'"
"The only meaningful remedy is vacatur of the relevant decisions and reconsideration by a newly constituted impartial PTAB panel free of financial conflicts."One day after U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal testified during a hearing before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet, Centripetal Networks filed a reply in support of its petition for a writ of mandamus in its patent dispute with Cisco.
PTAB Finds Centripetal's Recusal Arguments 'Frivolous' and 'Baseless,' Warns About Sanctions for Future Attacks
"[T]he Board pointed to language in cases cited by Centripetal indicating that recusal is only required when the financial interest is 'substantial...' [B]ecause APJ McNamara's financial interests met the de minimis exception, they were 'remote' and 'inconsequential' and therefore could not have been 'substantial.'"
'There was a line outside the door:' Thrilled gun shop owners weigh in on blocked weapons ban
Gun shop owners around the state were swamped with weekend crowds after a federal judge in the district court for the Southern District of Illinois issued an injunction Friday, blocking enforcement of the state's January ban on military-style firearms.When Roger Krahl, owner of RGuns in Carpentersville, heard about the injunction, he said the phones in his office lit up like a Christmas tree.
In Test of N.Y. Gun Law, Sheriff's Deputy Accused of Attempted Murder
The chaotic scene, captured by a police officer's body-worn camera, lasts less than 30 seconds.The officer, arm extended and ready to fire, shoves a bystander out of the way and rounds a corner onto a darkened street as a half-dozen shots ring out.Put the gun down, the officer yells, moving toward an armed man and his female companion in the near distance.
A Chew Toy for Dogs Provokes a Spirited Supreme Court Argument
WASHINGTON In a lively and lighthearted argument on Wednesday, the Supreme Court considered the fate of the Bad Spaniels Silly Squeaker, a chew toy for dogs that looks a lot like a bottle of Jack Daniel's, with the addition of some potty humor.Trademark cases generally turn on whether the public is likely to be confused about a product's source.
23,000 Student Loan Borrowers To Get $19 Million In Settlement - Who Qualifies
Around 23,000 student loan borrowers are slated to receive a check in the mail soon.No, not a loan forgiveness check - unfortunately - but a payout from a lawsuit that you may qualify to benefit from.Here's what you need to know.The lawsuit was brought by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and charged five debt relief companies - Docu Prep Center, Certified Doc Prep Services, Assure Direct Services, Direct Document Solutions, and Secure Preparation Services - with charging consumers with "unlawful advance fees."
Supreme Court Poised to Side With Anti-LGBTQ Web Designer in Discrimination Case
The plaintiff claims that a Colorado law barring anti-LGBTQ discrimination violates her religious freedoms.Demonstrators in favor of LGBT rights rally outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on October 8, 2019.Saul Loeb / AFP via Getty Images On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a lawsuit brought by an evangelical Christian web designer who alleges that a Colorado law barring discrimination based on sexual orientation is in violation of her religious freedoms.
'There was a line outside the door:' Thrilled gun shop owners weigh in on blocked weapons ban
Gun shop owners around the state were swamped with weekend crowds after a federal judge in the district court for the Southern District of Illinois issued an injunction Friday, blocking enforcement of the state's January ban on military-style firearms.When Roger Krahl, owner of RGuns in Carpentersville, heard about the injunction, he said the phones in his office lit up like a Christmas tree.
In Test of N.Y. Gun Law, Sheriff's Deputy Accused of Attempted Murder
The chaotic scene, captured by a police officer's body-worn camera, lasts less than 30 seconds.The officer, arm extended and ready to fire, shoves a bystander out of the way and rounds a corner onto a darkened street as a half-dozen shots ring out.Put the gun down, the officer yells, moving toward an armed man and his female companion in the near distance.
A Chew Toy for Dogs Provokes a Spirited Supreme Court Argument
WASHINGTON In a lively and lighthearted argument on Wednesday, the Supreme Court considered the fate of the Bad Spaniels Silly Squeaker, a chew toy for dogs that looks a lot like a bottle of Jack Daniel's, with the addition of some potty humor.Trademark cases generally turn on whether the public is likely to be confused about a product's source.
23,000 Student Loan Borrowers To Get $19 Million In Settlement - Who Qualifies
Around 23,000 student loan borrowers are slated to receive a check in the mail soon.No, not a loan forgiveness check - unfortunately - but a payout from a lawsuit that you may qualify to benefit from.Here's what you need to know.The lawsuit was brought by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and charged five debt relief companies - Docu Prep Center, Certified Doc Prep Services, Assure Direct Services, Direct Document Solutions, and Secure Preparation Services - with charging consumers with "unlawful advance fees."
Supreme Court Poised to Side With Anti-LGBTQ Web Designer in Discrimination Case
The plaintiff claims that a Colorado law barring anti-LGBTQ discrimination violates her religious freedoms.Demonstrators in favor of LGBT rights rally outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on October 8, 2019.Saul Loeb / AFP via Getty Images On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a lawsuit brought by an evangelical Christian web designer who alleges that a Colorado law barring discrimination based on sexual orientation is in violation of her religious freedoms.
Of course he didn't but his Judicial "Colleagues" advice was sought & they advised him that it's "Real Estate" & needn't be disclosed-esp. When everyone knows it's just a deal between two friends from 'Regular Stock' ...#GOPHypocrisy #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt
Justice Clarence Thomas failed to disclose 2014 real estate deal with GOP megadonor, ProPublica report finds
Justice Clarence Thomas failed to disclose a 2014 real estate deal he made with a GOP megadonor, according to a ProPublica report published Thursday.The deal involved the sale of three properties in Savannah, Georgia, that were owned by Thomas and his relatives to the megadonor, Harlan Crow, according to ProPublica, which said that tax and property records showed that Crow made the purchases through one of his companies for a total of $133,363.
Marriott removes Michael Irvin's $100 million lawsuit to federal court - ProFootballTalk
Hall of Fame Cowboys receiver Michael Irvin wisely sued Marriott in a court that would likely be more favorable to his interests.Marriott has now wisely shifted the case to a court that would likely be more favorable to its interests.Via Daniel Kaplan of TheAthletic.com,Marriott has removed the case from state court in Texas to federal court.
Judge Amos Mazzant will handle Michael Irvin's case against Marriott - ProFootballTalk
With Marriott removing Hall of Fame receiver Michael Irvin's $100 million defamation lawsuit to federal court, the corporation has secured a more favorable forum than a state court in which home cooking often is a reality.But there's a silver lining for Irvin.The federal judge who'll handle the case will be naturally inclined to look more favorably on Irvin's claims.
Marriott removes Michael Irvin's $100 million lawsuit to federal court - ProFootballTalk
Hall of Fame Cowboys receiver Michael Irvin wisely sued Marriott in a court that would likely be more favorable to his interests.Marriott has now wisely shifted the case to a court that would likely be more favorable to its interests.Via Daniel Kaplan of TheAthletic.com,Marriott has removed the case from state court in Texas to federal court.
Judge Amos Mazzant will handle Michael Irvin's case against Marriott - ProFootballTalk
With Marriott removing Hall of Fame receiver Michael Irvin's $100 million defamation lawsuit to federal court, the corporation has secured a more favorable forum than a state court in which home cooking often is a reality.But there's a silver lining for Irvin.The federal judge who'll handle the case will be naturally inclined to look more favorably on Irvin's claims.
Federal appeals court dismisses ERA case in another blow to legal fight for supporters
A federal appeals court on Tuesday dismissed a case brought by two Democratic states that sought to have the US archivist publish and certify the Equal Rights Amendment as part of the Constitution.The decision deals another blow to advocates' legal efforts to get the amendment, which they say would ban discrimination on the basis of sex, recognized as the 28th Amendment to the Constitution.
Meta agrees to pay $725 million to settle Cambridge Analytica class action lawsuit
Facebook's parent company Meta has agreed to pay $725 million to settle a years-long class action lawsuit triggered by disclosures in 2018 that the company shared user data with consulting firm Cambridge Analytica that was used for political advertising.The settlement ( which can be read in full here, via Reuters) does not include an admission of wrongdoing on Meta's part, and will still have to be approved by federal judges in the Northern District of California, reports CNBC.
Federal appeals court dismisses ERA case in another blow to legal fight for supporters
A federal appeals court on Tuesday dismissed a case brought by two Democratic states that sought to have the US archivist publish and certify the Equal Rights Amendment as part of the Constitution.The decision deals another blow to advocates' legal efforts to get the amendment, which they say would ban discrimination on the basis of sex, recognized as the 28th Amendment to the Constitution.
Meta agrees to pay $725 million to settle Cambridge Analytica class action lawsuit
Facebook's parent company Meta has agreed to pay $725 million to settle a years-long class action lawsuit triggered by disclosures in 2018 that the company shared user data with consulting firm Cambridge Analytica that was used for political advertising.The settlement ( which can be read in full here, via Reuters) does not include an admission of wrongdoing on Meta's part, and will still have to be approved by federal judges in the Northern District of California, reports CNBC.
When Songs Sound Similar, Courts Look for Musical DNA
On the surface, Ed Sheeran and Led Zeppelin might not seem to have a lot in common.Sheeran is a baby-faced singer-songwriter whose hummable ballads like Perfect and Photograph have become streaming-era pop standards.Led Zeppelin is a classic-rock colossus whose molten riffs are part of the foundation of heavy metal.
Supreme Court Weighs Ethics Code as Critics Push for Change
WASHINGTON As calls for the Supreme Court to adopt an ethics code mount, the justices continue to wrestle with whether to adopt a policy similar to one that applies to all other federal judges.The possibility of a code of judicial conduct for Supreme Court justices remains a subject of study and consideration at the court, a person familiar with the matter said.
John Roberts Says Judges Should Decide How Much Rat Poison Is Too Much For Your Hot Dogs
The Supreme Court overturned the Chevron doctrine, shifting power from agencies to federal judges.
Supreme Court Weighs Ethics Code as Critics Push for Change
WASHINGTON As calls for the Supreme Court to adopt an ethics code mount, the justices continue to wrestle with whether to adopt a policy similar to one that applies to all other federal judges.The possibility of a code of judicial conduct for Supreme Court justices remains a subject of study and consideration at the court, a person familiar with the matter said.
John Roberts Says Judges Should Decide How Much Rat Poison Is Too Much For Your Hot Dogs
The Supreme Court overturned the Chevron doctrine, shifting power from agencies to federal judges.