Research: Privacy as Pretense: Empirically Mapping the Gap Between Legislative & Judicial Protections of Privacy
60% of data privacy cases in U.S. federal courts from 2000 to 2020 were dismissed for failure to meet the strict injury threshold of Article III standing requirements.
There is a significant gap between the intended protection of privacy by legislators and the interpretation of courts in privacy cases. [ more ]
Research: Privacy as Pretense: Empirically Mapping the Gap Between Legislative & Judicial Protections of Privacy
60% of data privacy cases in U.S. federal courts from 2000 to 2020 were dismissed for failure to meet the strict injury threshold of Article III standing requirements.
There is a significant gap between the intended protection of privacy by legislators and the interpretation of courts in privacy cases. [ more ]
Research: Privacy as Pretense: Empirically Mapping the Gap Between Legislative & Judicial Protections of Privacy
60% of data privacy cases in U.S. federal courts from 2000 to 2020 were dismissed for failure to meet the strict injury threshold of Article III standing requirements.
There is a significant gap between the intended protection of privacy by legislators and the interpretation of courts in privacy cases. [ more ]
Research: Privacy as Pretense: Empirically Mapping the Gap Between Legislative & Judicial Protections of Privacy
60% of data privacy cases in U.S. federal courts from 2000 to 2020 were dismissed for failure to meet the strict injury threshold of Article III standing requirements.
There is a significant gap between the intended protection of privacy by legislators and the interpretation of courts in privacy cases. [ more ]
Research: Privacy as Pretense: Empirically Mapping the Gap Between Legislative & Judicial Protections of Privacy
60% of data privacy cases in U.S. federal courts from 2000 to 2020 were dismissed for failure to meet the strict injury threshold of Article III standing requirements.
There is a significant gap between the intended protection of privacy by legislators and the interpretation of courts in privacy cases. [ more ]