"It wasn't just a statement about weapons, or possibly an open reply to Donald Trump, who has shown interest in supplying them "depending on how Ukraine plans to use them" and wants assurances before making a final commitment. Ukraine refuses to let rage dictate its actions. For Ukraine, precision is not merely strategy, it's character. As I recently wrote on my social media, "It's honour that will, win this war. Russia lost that long ago, along with any moral bar to measure by.""
"The arrival of Tomahawks, if approved, is not just about firepower. It represents trust, from the Trump administration and from the West, trust that Ukraine will use such power responsibly. That trust has been earned, not demanded. I've seen what happens when power is abused, when military might becomes personal, vindictive, and unchecked, as I witnessed with Russian forces in Mariupol, and before that in Bosnia in the 1990s. Ukraine has resisted that temptation for over two years under the heaviest pressure imaginable."
"When Russia fires missiles into apartment blocks and shopping centres, Ukraine targets command posts, fuel depots, radar systems. Ukraine uses force with purpose, not for spectacle. Every strike is a message: we are not them."
Tomahawk missiles, if deployed, will be directed exclusively at Russian military targets. The use of long-range weapons is framed as a matter of precision, restraint, and moral distinction from indiscriminate attacks on civilians. Western approval and potential provision of such missiles is described as an act of trust earned by disciplined targeting practices. Ukrainian targeting focuses on command posts, fuel depots, and radar systems rather than civilian infrastructure. Concerns about escalation are countered by the argument that intent, not range, determines ethical use, and that Russia escalated the conflict through cross-border attacks and threats.
Read at London Business News | Londonlovesbusiness.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]