"Seems like a pretty straightforward thing to answer, right? But like Donnie says, this takes some strategy. Like, say spacing is high on your priority list. Are you going to use margin? padding? Perhaps you're leaning into layout and go with gap as part of a flexbox direction... but then you're committing to display as one of your options. That can quickly eat up your choices!"
"Our answers are pretty consistent, but converged even more as the discussion wore on and all of us were coming at it with different priorities. I'll share each person's "gut" reaction because I like how raw it is. I think you'll see that there's always a compromise in the mix, but those compromises really reveal a person's cards as far as what they think is most important in a situation with overly tight constraints."
"Juan and I came out pretty close to the same choices, as we'll see in a bit: font: Typography is a priority and we get a lot of constituent properties with this single shorthand. padding: A little padding makes things breath and helps with visual separation. background: Another shorthand with lots of styling possibilities in a tiny package. color: More visual hierarchy."
A prompt to build a website using only four CSS properties forces strategic selection and clear trade-offs. Priorities such as spacing, layout, or typography determine which properties best serve the design goals. Shorthand properties like font and background offer many sub-properties within a single declaration, while padding and color address spacing and visual hierarchy. Choosing layout-focused properties such as flex-direction and width supports responsive structure but consumes options needed for other concerns. Different selections reveal what designers prioritize when constraints are tight, and compromises expose practical front-end problem-solving approaches under limited resources.
Read at CSS-Tricks
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]