""What am I supposed to do if my company pivots like 4 times a year?" a Lead Designer asked me recently. It's a question that captures the current reality of design work. While the job market remains challenging, designers who are still employed face a different pressure: businesses are demanding faster output with smaller teams. Many designers find themselves forced into startup environments, not by choice. 0A combination of AI tools and layoffs has reduced mid-size companies to skeleton crews that must operate at startup speed."
"You're being asked to work faster and more efficiently...but leadership's vision keeps shifting. You're revisiting old design ideas from 2023 one quarter, then chasing completely new features the next. Different stakeholders demand different priorities, and you're uncertain how to manage the constant pivoting. Traditional UX processes struggle in these conditions. By the time you've created comprehensive user personas, detailed customer journeys, or elaborate design systems, they're already outdated."
Designers face rapid, repeated company pivots that force constant reprioritization. Businesses demand faster output from smaller, skeleton crews due to AI adoption and layoffs. Many designers end up in startup-style environments without choosing that path. Leadership vision frequently shifts, requiring revisiting past designs one quarter and pursuing new features the next. Conflicting stakeholder priorities create uncertainty about how to manage continuous pivoting. Traditional UX processes, including comprehensive personas, customer journeys, and elaborate design systems, become outdated by the time they are completed. Designers must adapt workflows to deliver quickly in volatile product contexts.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]