In the recent Supreme Court ruling on Trump v Casa, Inc., the justices decided to limit the ability of lower federal courts to issue nationwide injunctions against executive actions. This decision, while presented as a measure to respect presidential authority, effectively enhances the power of the president to circumvent constitutional protections. The consequence is a fragmented legal landscape where citizenship rights can vary based on geographic location and ongoing lawsuits, raising concerns about the safeguard of rights in the U.S.
The ruling curtails nationwide injunctions against Trump's order ending birthright citizenship, allowing a chaotic patchwork of rights enforceability across the U.S.
The Court's decision creates a jurisprudence of citizenship whereby entitlement to rights for citizens now hinges on state residency and ongoing litigation.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor contends the new legal regime threatens all rights, warning that Donald Trump can nullify constitutional protections at his discretion.
What the court claims it is doing may obscure the reality that it is expanding presidential power, enabling potential constitutional violations.
#supreme-court #birthright-citizenship #presidential-authority #judicial-power #constitutional-rights
Collection
[
|
...
]