"If the infrastructure is not taken out and the money is not taken away why should Iran come to the peace table. They are taunting us with $200 oil. They do not have the cards; our military must be unleashed. Time to do what we did to Hanoi—to get them to the table."
"Understand i do not want a North Vietnam situation, he wrote. That will be terrible. Things would be getting totally out of hand. What matters is safety of our warfighters and a resolution. It is vital that this war end, and if possible, on our terms, if we can get them."
"I am saying that Kissinger had a solution, but it was a horrible solution. We want something that is not horrendous. But we need an off ramp. And i am very sorry if i offended. I simply wanted to remind people what could happen. NOT WHAT I WANT TO HAPPEN."
Crude oil prices approached $100 per barrel following U.S. and Israeli bombing campaigns against Iran, which retaliated by attacking Israel, U.S. military assets, and shipping vessels in the Strait of Hormuz—a critical waterway transporting 20% of global oil. Iran threatened to push oil prices to $200 per barrel. Jim Cramer tweeted that the U.S. military should intensify operations against Iran's infrastructure and financial assets to force them to negotiate, invoking the Vietnam War carpet-bombing of Hanoi as a reference. After backlash, Cramer clarified his position across multiple posts, stating he opposed a prolonged conflict like Vietnam and sought a negotiated resolution prioritizing military personnel safety.
#iran-israel-conflict #oil-market-volatility #military-escalation #strait-of-hormuz #geopolitical-tensions
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]