"What we call implicit obligations are twice the size of explicit obligations. If the U.S. government were required to report its finances under the same accounting rules as a publicly traded corporation, we'd be reporting a debt-to-GDP ratio closer to 300%. The gap between those two numbers is not a rounding error—it is the deliberate product of federal accounting standards designed to keep the full picture hidden from the public."
"It's not a Ponzi scheme, it's a shell game. A Ponzi scheme implies fraud, but Social Security never promised a higher return. The distinction matters because implicit obligations carry moral or political, but not legal, force, representing expected future spending commitments buried inside programs like Social Security and Medicare."
The reported U.S. national debt of $39 trillion significantly underestimates actual fiscal obligations. Kent Smetters, faculty director of the Penn Wharton Budget Model, argues the true debt approaches $100 trillion when accounting for implicit obligations—unfunded liabilities in Social Security and Medicare that represent twice the size of explicit legal debts. Under corporate accounting standards, the debt-to-GDP ratio would reach 300% rather than the current 100%. Federal accounting rules deliberately obscure these implicit obligations from public view. Smetters distinguishes Social Security's pay-as-you-go structure as a shell game rather than a Ponzi scheme, emphasizing the political and moral nature of these future spending commitments.
Read at Fortune
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]