Testimony against Sean Combs was shocking and graphic. But was it enough to convict?
Briefly

The trial against Sean 'Diddy' Combs is approaching its conclusion, focusing on numerous alleged sex crimes and conspiracies spanning years. The prosecution claims Combs utilized his wealth and status to cover up an array of abusive actions, supported by testimony describing a pervasive culture of violence within his music empire. Legal experts note the case is not as clear-cut as headlines suggest, as the defense acknowledges some misconduct but contends that the legal charges are overstated and inadequately supported by timely evidence from witnesses.
Combs "doesn't take no for an answer," Assistant U.S. Atty. Christy Slavik told jurors, emphasizing the alleged pattern of abuse and cover-ups.
The theory of the defense seems to be that Diddy did really horrible things, but they don't meet the elements of the crimes charged, according to legal expert Jeff Chemerinsky.
Combs' attorney labeled the prosecution's case "exaggerated" and admitted to domestic violence but claimed the serious charges were not substantiated.
Prosecutors have likened Combs' alleged actions to a mob-like criminal enterprise, asserting he used his power to conceal crimes.
Read at Los Angeles Times
[
|
]