The Supreme Court eliminated the power to issue universal injunctions by striking them down. Additionally, the Court addressed the teaching of LGBTQ+ subjects in schools by expanding strict scrutiny for parents with religious complaints. Justice Sonia Sotomayor recognized that dissenting opinions could characterize majority rulings if the latter chose to obscure them. Meanwhile, the University of Florida Law School awarded a prize for a paper advocating a Whites-Only Constitution, leading to inadequate justification from the institution regarding this decision.
Taking a sledgehammer where a chisel would do, the Supreme Court nixed injunctions it didn't like by striking down the power to issue universal injunctions totally.
The Supreme Court addressed schools teaching that gay people exist by expanding strict scrutiny to parents lodging religious complaints.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor figured out that if the majority wants to hide their rulings, the dissent can characterize them on their own.
The University of Florida Law School gave a top prize to a paper advocating a Whites-Only Constitution, leaving their explanation lacking.
Collection
[
|
...
]