Jack Smith Didn't Clear Trump on Jan. 6 He Explained His Case

"Asked whether he developed evidence that Donald Trump was responsible for the violence at the Capitol on January 6, Smith did not say yes or no. He said Trump caused the circumstances, exploited the violence once it began, and understood what it was doing for him. That answer is now at the center of a political firestorm because the Justice Department released the full 255-page transcript of Smith's closed-door testimony late on New Year's Eve, a timing that guaranteed selective reading and rapid political framing."

"Within hours, Republicans and conservative commentators were declaring victory, portraying Smith's words as a concession that Trump had effectively been given a pass. House Judiciary Republicans, led by Chairman Jim Jordan, triumphantly declared Game over. Byron York argued that Smith's answer should have been a simple no, and that anything short of that revealed the hollowness of the January 6 case. Washington Examiner's Kaelan Deese framed Smith's testimony as an admission that Trump never ordered the breach and was nonetheless blamed anyway."

"Smith was never alleging that Trump ordered a mob to storm the Capitol or directed specific acts of violence. There is no evidence of that, and Smith acknowledged it plainly. It explains the boundaries of the case. It does not weaken it. Trump was charged with fraud, conspiracy, and obstruction because prosecutors believed those charges captured what the evidence supported beyond a reasonable doubt. Smith was not asked to relitigate a theory he never advanced."

Jack Smith testified that he did not contend Donald Trump ordered the Capitol violence on January 6, but that Trump caused conditions, exploited the violence once it began, and understood its political effects. The Justice Department released the full 255-page transcript late on New Year's Eve, producing selective reading and rapid political framing. Republicans and conservative commentators portrayed the testimony as a concession and declared victory. Smith clarified that no evidence showed Trump directed specific acts of violence. Prosecutors focused on fraud, conspiracy, and obstruction charges because those counts matched the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Smith explained why incitement or violence-related charges were not pursued.

Read at www.mediaite.com