Inside the $64 million midterm civil war infuriating Democratic Party leadership

"Typically what I do with my money is send it to the districts that need it. With a fierce primary battle on his hands, that money doesn't go to the swing districts. We'll probably spend, in that primary, $5 million. Last year I probably spent more like $400,000."

"This is the new reality we live in, where people do not care about the party and trying to win. They just care about moving their ideological wing of the party forward."

"Nearly a dozen House Democrats are facing primary challengers who have raised more money than they have. Many of these primary insurgents - along with a huge cohort of outsiders and progressives running in open primaries - have declined to commit to supporting Jeffries' leadership if elected."

Democratic House primary races have collectively raised over $64 million this cycle, representing a significant shift from 2018. Nearly a dozen incumbent House Democrats face primary challengers who have raised more money than they have. Many of these insurgent candidates and progressive outsiders have declined to commit to supporting Hakeem Jeffries' leadership if elected. This contrasts sharply with 2018, when primary challengers had minimal funding. Incumbents like Rep. John Larson report spending substantially more on primaries, diverting resources from swing districts. Party leadership expresses frustration that challengers prioritize ideological advancement over party unity. The primary battles reflect generational divides, with younger candidates challenging aging incumbents and criticizing the party establishment's approach to opposing Republicans.

Read at Axios