Dana Stroul: US, Israel Achieving Military Gains In Iran, But Political End Remains Unclear

"From a defense policy perspective, I thought what General Kaine, the chairman of our Joint Chiefs of Staff, yesterday said was really important. He said the military objective was to eliminate Iran's ability to project power across the Middle East. And what he means by that are the three major concerns that US defense policymakers have had for a really long time: Iran's nuclear weapons program, Iran's missile program, and Iran's support for terrorism across the Middle East."

"Tehran's conventional capabilities are being degraded but cautioned that Iran still has other options - including cyber operations and activating networks beyond the Middle East - and that pressures from casualties, munitions and interceptor stocks, and global economic fallout could grow the longer the war continues."

"Within the first 48 hours of this campaign, Israel and the United States together achieved air supremacy over Iran. And so US forces moved from using weapons at sea, we call it standoff weapons, to what they say are stand in weapons. We now have fighter aircraft over Iran taking out missiles and drones and things like this."

US and Israeli air strikes are successfully degrading Iran's conventional military capabilities, including its nuclear weapons program, missile program, and support for terrorism across the Middle East. Within 48 hours, the coalition achieved air supremacy over Iran, enabling fighter aircraft to target missiles and drones directly. However, military objectives alone are insufficient without a comprehensive political strategy for what follows the conflict. Iran retains alternative options including cyber operations and activating networks beyond the Middle East. Prolonged conflict risks mounting casualties, munitions depletion, interceptor stock shortages, and significant global economic consequences that could complicate long-term regional stability.

Read at RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty