"The killing of political activist Charlie Kirk has thrown into sharp relief the hostility between conservatives and progressives and between champions of free speech and crusaders against hate propaganda. It also highlights a less obvious dichotomy: between a marketplace of commodified opinion, on the one hand, and seedbeds for deliberation and dialogue, on the other. The former dominates the political culture in open societies. The latter is what universities urgently need to cultivate."
""The New York Times columnist Ezra Klein privileged the ethos of the marketplace in his immediate response to the news of Kirk's death. "Kirk was practicing politics in exactly the right way. He was showing up to campuses and talking with anyone who would talk to him," Klein wrote, noting that the controversial speaker believed in "argument ... to be won with words." Klein's tribute to an ideological opponent may be grounded in liberal political philosophy, but it fails to grasp the political economy of the marketplace that made Kirk a cultural powerhouse.""
The killing of a political activist exposed intense hostility between conservatives and progressives and between defenders of free speech and opponents of hate propaganda. The event also revealed a deeper contrast between a commodified marketplace of opinion and university seedbeds for deliberation and dialogue. The marketplace now dominates political culture in open societies, while universities urgently need to cultivate deliberative spaces. Some praised marketplace engagement and public debate as defending argument by words. The activist's rise, however, rested on donor-backed commodification, content-driven campaigning, and converting campus encounters into online influence rather than genuine persuasion.
Read at Inside Higher Ed | Higher Education News, Events and Jobs
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]