How the GOP Could Lose in November and Still Take the House
Briefly

How the GOP Could Lose in November and Still Take the House
"Under normal circumstances, redistricting happens only once a decade after the decennial census is taken, and House seats are redistributed among the states based on population trends. If that had been the case this year, Democrats would have been a virtual cinch to flip control of the House, where Republicans have a tiny (three seat) margin of control. In part, that's because the non-White House party almost always makes gain in midterm elections and in part because President Trump is very unpopular."
"But long story short, Republicans gave themselves an apparent cushion in the race for control of the House by rearranging more seats in their favor (in Texas, North Carolina, Missouri, Ohio, and Florida) than Democrats did in California (with an additional Democratic-leaning seat in Utah being provided by a state-court decision). Then the U.S. Supreme Court opened the way to last-minute gerrymanders in Republican-controlled southern states where the previous rules required protection of majority-Black districts under the Voting Rights Act of 1965."
"And for the coup de grace, the Virginia Supreme Court invalidated a voter-approved Democratic gerrymander in Virginia. Depending on exactly what happens in Alabama, Louisiana, and South Carolina in the days just ahead, where as many as five Democratic-controlled majority-Black congressional district are potentially on the chopping block, Republicans have shifted the national House map by as much as a dozen seats."
"What this means in terms of the fight for control of the House obviously depends on how big a Democratic wave materializes at the polls in November. But even before all the gerrymandering, Democrats were coping with a restricted House battleground landscape thanks to partisan polarization, so not"
Redistricting for the 2026 U.S. House elections remains highly unsettled due to rapid, reciprocal map changes by both parties and major court rulings on gerrymandering. Normally, redistricting occurs once per decade after the census, redistributing House seats based on population trends. Without the current disruptions, Democrats would likely have been able to flip House control, given Republicans’ narrow three-seat margin, Democrats’ typical midterm gains, and President Trump’s low popularity. Republicans have created an apparent cushion by rearranging more seats in their favor across several states, while Democrats have relied on limited countermeasures. The U.S. Supreme Court enabled last-minute gerrymanders in southern states by altering protections for majority-Black districts, and Virginia’s court invalidated a Democratic gerrymander. Additional potential losses in other states could further shift the national map by up to about a dozen seats, depending on election outcomes and remaining court actions.
Read at Intelligencer
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]