The Guardian view on a cabinet resignation: Labour's leadership crisis is really an identity crisis | Editorial

"The health secretary, Wes Streeting, resigned from the cabinet but did not launch a leadership bid. Rather than provoke a contest, Mr Streeting's message to Sir Keir was that since his authority was gone, his duty was to depart and enable an orderly transition rather than cling to office. If the Labour leadership were truly up for grabs, winning it would require opportunism, a feel for elite collapse and a willingness to defy both the party establishment and orthodoxy."

"Those who successfully seize the crown Lloyd George, Harold Macmillan, Margaret Thatcher and Boris Johnson recognise their moment and act decisively. These leaders were also not subject to the Labour party rulebook. Sir Keir's grip is loosening, but replacing a sitting Labour prime minister is institutionally and politically difficult. Not least because any successor would still need to unite large sections of the parliamentary party and trade union movement, as well as the activist base and wider membership."

"In the meantime, Britain faces a damaged prime minister, a fractured ruling party and no clear route out of a political crisis just as another brutal cost-of-living squeeze takes hold. If Sir Keir stays in post and Mr Streeting or anyone else wants to challenge him, then under Labour's rules they need a fifth of Labour's MPs to back them. Sir Keir automatically gets on to the ballot as the incumbent leader."

"Getting 81 MPs to publicly back a coup is extremely difficult unless the leader's sway has already evaporated. Sir Keir could follow Mr Streeting's advice and resign for a caretaker leader. That may now be the least damaging option. But Labour's rules make swift succession difficult, requiring candidates to canvass support from constituency parties and trade unions."

Opportunities for supreme power in politics are rare and fleeting, which makes potential challengers more cautious rather than more ruthless. Wes Streeting resigned from the cabinet but did not launch a leadership bid, signaling that with his authority gone his duty was to depart and enable an orderly transition. Winning leadership would require opportunism, sensitivity to elite collapse, and willingness to defy party establishment and orthodoxy. Replacing a sitting Labour prime minister is institutionally and politically difficult because any successor must unite parliamentary factions, the trade union movement, the activist base, and wider membership. Britain faces a damaged prime minister, a fractured ruling party, and no clear route out of a political crisis amid another cost-of-living squeeze. Under Labour rules, a challenger needs backing from a fifth of Labour MPs, while the incumbent automatically appears on the ballot, making a coup hard without already weakened leadership. A caretaker resignation could be less damaging, but Labour rules require candidates to canvass support from constituency parties and trade unions.

Read at www.theguardian.com