"In a year flooded with workforce commentary, the U.S. labor market was a central subject in 2025. While readership is not a perfect indicator, it does offer a revealing filter. Looking across my articles that significantly outperformed others this year, a clear pattern emerged: readers engaged most when pieces surfaced immediate exposure rather than long-term aspiration. During periods of disruption, people tend to focus less on what might help them in the future and more on what is already shaping their options."
"Although I published extensively on resilience, reskilling and AI optimism, those narratives consistently underperformed articles that made power visible-who decided, whose access was narrowed and who absorbed the impact. In a turbulent year, readership shifted from inspiration to perceived risk. Across very different workforce contexts, readers sought to understand how opportunity was being reshaped by concentrated decision-making and constrained access. In several of my highest-performing workforce analyses this year, readers engaged most when articles surfaced immediate exposure rather than long-term aspiration."
Readership concentrated on workforce analyses that exposed immediate structural risks, concentrated decision-making, and constrained access. During disruption, attention shifted from future-oriented resilience and reskilling narratives to who decides, whose access is narrowed, and who absorbs impacts. Audiences prioritized pieces that highlighted immediate exposure over long-term aspiration. Across diverse workforce contexts, readers sought understanding of how opportunity was reshaped by concentrated power and constrained access. Social platforms like Bluesky experienced missteps that underscored gaps in protection for marginalized users, illustrating how platform governance and decision-making can narrow access and compound risk for vulnerable groups.
Read at Forbes
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]