Pentagon will 'never again' rely on a single AI provider, official says
Briefly

Pentagon will 'never again' rely on a single AI provider, official says
"“We were single-threaded on one vendor, one AI vendor at the Department of War, and to integrate into classified systems is not just putting your software on a public cloud and having it work,” Michael said, referring to his agency's contract with Anthropic. “These are sophisticated, protective systems that take a lot of work to integrate on, so it wasn't like I could just turn on a few other models that easily. But never again we'll be single-threaded with any one model.”"
"Michael said that the recent deals between eight leading AI developers and the Department of Defense are both a private sector statement of support for working with the government, as well as a step towards the Pentagon's goal to diversify its tech stack with different providers. He framed the agreements as backing for lawful use cases across the armed services."
"Michael continued to say that the new deals with Amazon Web Services, Google, Microsoft, NVIDIA, OpenAI, Reflection, Oracle and SpaceX are “a statement by the biggest tech companies in the world who are involved in the AI space ... and have them say, 'We support the Department of War, we support the U.S. government, and we support the... armed services for all lawful use cases.'”"
Leadership at the Pentagon emphasized commitment to diversifying artificial intelligence service providers. Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering Emil Michael said the department is not single-threaded with any one model, especially for classified systems. He described prior reliance on a single vendor and explained that integrating sophisticated protective systems requires substantial work beyond simply deploying software on a public cloud. He said recent deals with major AI and technology companies support working with the government and advance diversification of the tech stack. His remarks also came amid a dispute involving Anthropic, including concerns about supply chain risk and steps to remove the company’s technology from agency use.
Read at Nextgov.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]