"Harrison's area of expertise is Wikipedia. So it's possible he's biased here, but his criticisms are not small ones. I asked Harrison to pull up Elon Musk's Grokipedia page. It is very, very long. But if you dig in, you'll find some lines that are really telling. Grok portrays the Tesla CEO through stubbornly rose-colored lenses. While Grokipedia notes Musk's social media leadership has been scrutinized, it also says criticism of him has come from "legacy media outlets that exhibit systemic left-leaning tilts in coverage.""
"It's hard to figure out what Grokipedia actually is. In some ways, there has been a lot of discussion about bias on Wikipedia. I wonder if Elon Musk sensed an opening and thought, 'Well, I could take what we have from Grok.' Wikipedia's information is available under a Creative Commons license-it's freely licensed. He maybe saw the idea of an A.I.-generated encyclopedia and wanted to be first to market."
Grokipedia is an A.I.-powered encyclopedia associated with Elon Musk that contains very long entries but exhibits numerous flaws and questionable accuracy. The Grok-generated profile of Musk displays favorable framing and portrays criticism as originating from 'legacy media outlets that exhibit systemic left-leaning tilts in coverage.' A Wikipedia expert highlights potential bias and doubts about reliability. Observers characterize Grokipedia as part of a broader right-wing initiative to challenge trust in traditional institutions such as academia, journalism, and Wikipedia. The strategy aims to erode public confidence in established sources and steer audiences toward alternative, ideologically aligned information platforms.
Read at Slate Magazine
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]