"There is no competition. I don't know if anyone uses Grokipedia. I think it is a ridiculous idea that will never work. One of our core values at Wikipedia is neutrality. A neutral point of view is non-negotiable. It's in the community, unquestioned... The idea that we've become somehow 'Wokepidea' is just not true."
"My initial impression, looking at my own article and poking around here and there, is that Grokipedia is very OK. The jury's still out as to whether it's actually better than Wikipedia. But at this point I would have to say 'maybe!' Even in its V0.1 form, Grokipedia was already better than Wikipedia."
"Wikipedia has drifted from its original vision, citing concerns about how its 'Reliable sources/Perennial sources' framework categorizes publications by perceived credibility. Sanger argued that Wikipedia's approach to determining source reliability has become problematic in how it evaluates information credibility."
Elon Musk responded to Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales' criticism of Grokipedia with the quip "Famous last words." Wales dismissed the AI-powered encyclopedia alternative as ridiculous and destined to fail while defending Wikipedia's neutrality against accusations of bias. However, Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger offered a more favorable assessment, calling Grokipedia "very OK" and suggesting it might be better than Wikipedia even in its early V0.1 form. Musk agreed with Sanger's evaluation. Sanger has previously criticized Wikipedia for drifting from its original vision, particularly regarding how it categorizes publication credibility through its "Reliable sources" framework.
Read at TESLARATI
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]