
"According to conventional thinking, a retiree with $500,000 looking to withdraw 4% annually through the gradual selling of shares is hoping that the math holds up for the next 30 years. If it does, this scenario would produce around $20,000 annually, or around $1,667 monthly. The challenge is that it would require the selling of assets regardless of whether the market is up or down."
"Sue's question wondered what would happen if the portfolio paid her instead of the other way around? If she put $500,000 spread across three different funds and earned around $37,000 per year without having to sell a single share, wouldn't this make the most sense?"
"If you do the math, the Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF adds another $2,505 to your total, while the Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF will help contribute another $1,554. All totaled, you are looking at roughly $37,053 annually, or approximately $3,088 per month. As a result, you are looking at a blended yield of 7.42%, with two of the three funds paying out monthly and the Schwab ETF paying out quarterly, so you are receiving at least some money every month, just like a paycheck."
A conventional retirement withdrawal approach assumes selling assets each year, even when markets decline. An alternative approach uses portfolio distributions to fund spending. Sue considers investing $500,000 across three funds: $390,000 in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF, $75,000 in Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF, and $35,000 in Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF. The JPMorgan holding is the main income source, producing about $32,994 annually at current yields. The Schwab fund adds about $2,505 and the bond fund adds about $1,554, totaling roughly $37,053 per year. The blended yield is about 7.42%, with monthly distributions from two funds and quarterly distributions from the Schwab fund, creating more regular cash flow.
Read at 24/7 Wall St.
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]