"In avalanche safety training, there is one rule that overrides all others: if a single person in the group says 'no,' everyone turns around. Corporate boards could learn something from that."
"Research suggests dissent occurs in only about 1% of board decisions. That unanimity often reveals as much about group dynamics as it does about genuine agreement."
"The most dangerous variable, instructors often say, is not the snowpack. It is the group. Corporate boardrooms operate under strikingly similar conditions."
"Consensus has obvious virtues. Boards function best when directors ultimately align behind a course of action. A unified board gives management clarity and confidence in execution."
Unanimous decisions in corporate boards often mask underlying dissent, similar to avalanche safety where one dissenting voice prompts a retreat. Research shows dissent occurs in only 1% of board decisions, indicating pressure to conform. This pressure can silence critical voices, leading to potentially dangerous outcomes. While consensus can provide clarity and confidence in execution, it may also signal a lack of genuine agreement. The dynamics of group decision-making in boardrooms can mirror those in avalanche training, where the group itself poses the greatest risk.
Read at Fortune
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]