"Last year saw a rapid increase in court sanctions against attorneys for filing briefs containing errors generated by artificial intelligence tools. The most prominent case was that of the lawyers for MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, who were fined $3,000 each for filing briefs containing fictitious, AI-generated citations."
"We have this issue because AI is just too good but not perfect. The numbers started taking off last year, and Charlotin says the rate is still increasing. He counts a total of more than 1,200 to date, of which about 800 are from U.S. courts."
"A federal court may have set a new record last month with an order for a lawyer in Oregon to pay $109,700 in sanctions and costs for filing AI-generated errors."
"I am surprised that people are still doing this when it's been in the news. She's designing special training in AI ethics for students who are interested."
The use of AI by lawyers has led to a surge in court sanctions due to errors in legal briefs. Prominent cases include fines for fictitious citations, with over 1,200 instances recorded globally, primarily in U.S. courts. Penalties are escalating, exemplified by a recent $109,700 sanction against a lawyer in Oregon. High-profile cases have occurred at state supreme courts, where attorneys have faced scrutiny for AI-related mistakes. Despite media coverage, the trend continues, prompting legal educators to develop AI ethics training for law students.
Read at www.npr.org
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]