The AWS outage post-mortem is more revealing in what it doesn't say

"When AWS suffered a series of cascading failures that crashed its systems for hours in late October, the industry was once again reminded of its extreme dependence on major hyperscalers. The incident also shed an uncomfortable light on how fragile these massive environments have become. In Amazon's detailed post-mortem report, the cloud giant detailed a vast array of delicate systems that keeps global operations functioning - at least, most of the time."

"It is impressive that this combination of systems works as well as it does - and therein lies the problem. The foundation for this environment was created decades ago. And while Amazon deserves applause for how brilliant that system was when it was created, the environment, scale and complexity facing hyperscalers today are orders of magnitude beyond what those original designers envisioned."

"'Amazon is admitting that one of its automation tools took down part of its own network,' Ciabarra said. 'The outage exposed how deeply interdependent and fragile our systems have become. It doesn't provide any confidence that it won't happen again. 'Improved safeguards' and 'better change management' sound like procedural fixes, but they're not proof of architectural resilience. If AWS wants to win back enterprise confidence, it needs to show hard evidence that one regional incident can't cascade"

AWS experienced a multi-hour cascading failure that revealed extreme industry dependence on major hyperscalers and similar vulnerabilities at other providers. The outage exposed fragile, deeply interdependent systems and the complexity of global operations built on decades-old foundations. Incremental, bolt-on patches and procedural safeguards are inadequate for the current scale and interdependence of cloud environments. Hyperscalers need substantial re-architecting or entirely new systems to prevent single regional incidents from cascading globally. Automation tools and change processes contributed to the outage, showing that procedural fixes alone cannot guarantee architectural resilience.

Read at Computerworld