
"For decades, the default answer to almost any investing question was simple: buy an index fund and hold it forever. That advice survived recessions, wars, inflation spikes, and financial crises because, historically, it worked. According to data from S&P 500S&P Dow Jones Indices, the S&P 500 has returned roughly 10% annually over the long haul, though almost no single year actually delivered that neat number. Some years surged. Others cratered. But the overall trajectory pointed higher."
"The original appeal of the S&P 500 was diversification. Investors owned 500 of America's largest companies across industries ranging from banking and energy to healthcare and manufacturing. If one sector stumbled, another often picked up the slack. That balance has changed dramatically. The 10 largest companies in the S&P 500 of the index's total value. More surprising, semiconductor stocks now account for more than one-fifth of the index's market cap."
"That means your “diversified” index fund increasingly rises or falls based on what happens to a handful of mega-cap technology stocks. The semiconductor trade has become the tail wagging the dog. The PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index has climbed 146% over the past two years, compared with the S&P 500's 43% gain over the same period. Chip stocks are increasingly driving index performance."
"Granted, companies tied to artificial intelligence are generating real revenue and cash flow. This is not 1999-era vaporware. But concentration risk is concentration risk regardless of how profitable the businesses are."
The long-standing investing approach of buying an index fund and holding has often worked because the S&P 500 historically delivered about 10% annual returns over long periods, even though individual years varied widely. That history supported the belief that the S&P 500 is “safe” due to diversification across many industries. The index’s composition has shifted, with the largest companies now representing a much larger share of total value. Semiconductors now account for more than one-fifth of the index’s market capitalization, meaning index performance increasingly depends on a small group of technology stocks. Semiconductor gains have outpaced the broader index, raising concentration risk even when underlying businesses generate real revenue and cash flow.
Read at 24/7 Wall St.
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]