""Go, litel book," he bids the manuscript that's soon to be out of his hands. "That thou be understonde I god beseche!" Had Chaucer stuck around to witness the ensuing six hundred-plus years of literary discourse-and the past few decades in particular-he might have concluded that, when it comes to being understonde, the litel books aren't the ones you have to worry about. It's the big ones that'll get you."
"The occasion is a moment to ask how a novel that mourns addiction and venerates humility and patience became a glib cultural punch line-a byword for literary arrogance, a totem of masculine pretentiousness, a red flag if spotted on the shelves of a prospective partner, and reading matter routinely subjected to the word "performative" in its most damning sense. At a thousand and seventy-nine pages, "Infinite Jest" has become a one-liner."
A Chauceran anecdote about a litel book and reception anxiety frames the idea that large works attract prolonged scrutiny. Infinite Jest pairs massive physical length with heavy reputational weight and centers themes of addiction, humility, and patience. The novel's size and prestige have been refracted into a shorthand for perceived literary arrogance and masculine pretension. Popular discourse and media examples have produced a recognizable stereotype of the "Infinite Jest" bro and prompted questions about performative reading and public displays of ambitious literature. Despite cultural shorthand and scorn, the novel's complexity and demands reward invested, patient attention.
Read at The New Yorker
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]