"The C-suite is caught in an AI pressure cooker. On one side, boards and CEOs see the relentless headlines of AI-driven layoffs at major technology firms and ask a simple, pressing question: "Where are our savings?". This creates immense pressure on CIOs to realise financial returns from AI, with the implicit assumption that the primary path to that return is workforce reduction. On the other side is the sobering reality of execution."
"This disconnect exists because the C-suite is operating from a flawed premise. The narrative that AI is already enabling widespread, productivity-driven job cuts is dangerously misleading for most organisations. As technology leaders, the primary mandate is to deconstruct this myth and ground executive teams in a more analytical, data-driven reality. The most dangerous strategic error a CIO can make today is to mistake a pivot to a new business model for a simple efficiency gain."
The C-suite faces intense pressure to produce financial returns from AI, often assuming workforce reduction is the primary path. Many CIOs see AI failing to meet ROI expectations. The prevailing narrative that AI enables widespread productivity-driven job cuts is misleading for most organisations. High-profile tech layoffs frequently represent strategic talent reallocation toward new AI-driven revenue streams rather than automation-based efficiency gains. CIOs must distinguish between pivots to new business models and simple efficiency improvements. Implementation strategies should align with desired outcomes because there are distinct layoff strategies and talent patterns, and most enterprises do not match the headline cases.
Read at ComputerWeekly.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]