ChatGPT: so popular, hardly anyone will pay for it
Briefly

ChatGPT: so popular, hardly anyone will pay for it
"OpenAI is losing about three times more money than it's earning, and 95 percent of those using ChatGPT, which generates roughly 70 percent of the company's recurring revenue, aren't paying a dime to help stem the losses. For this level of success, the company is reportedly valued at about $500 billion, even as it commits to spending more than $1 trillion that it doesn't have in partnership deals over the next five years."
"According to a report published last month in The Information, OpenAI during the first half of 2025 collected $4.3 billion in revenue while still posting a net loss of $13.5 billion during that six month period. More than half of that loss is attributable to "remeasurement of convertible interest rights," which The Information suggests is a reference to billions of dollars' worth of convertible equity issued to investors."
"About 70 percent of OpenAI's recurring revenue reportedly comes from those paying for ChatGPT subscriptions ( Free, $20/month, $200/month). But of ChatGPT's 800 million users, just 5 percent pay, according to a senior executive who spoke to the Financial Times. Menlo Ventures came to a similar estimate based on a $10 billion annual run rate and about 800 million monthly active users - about 40 million would be paying $20 per month to generate that much revenue."
OpenAI collected $4.3 billion in revenue during the first half of 2025 and posted a net loss of $13.5 billion for that period. More than half of the loss stemmed from remeasurement of convertible interest rights tied to convertible equity obligations. Operating losses for the period approached $8 billion while the company books about $13 billion in annual recurring revenue. Roughly 70 percent of recurring revenue comes from ChatGPT subscriptions, yet only about 5 percent of ChatGPT's 800 million users pay. The company has an approximate $500 billion valuation and has committed over $1 trillion in partnership spending over five years.
Read at Theregister
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]