Designers see MVP as lacking in visual appeal and research time, developers view it as maximizing work before a release, managers prioritize cost-effectiveness. The concept varies in meaning among different roles.
MVP lacks emphasis on making products delightful or meaningful. Some designers propose Minimum Lovable Product or Minimum Marketable Product as alternatives, highlighting gaps in the traditional MVP concept.
The confusion surrounding MVP stems from differing interpretations among stakeholders. The debate on MVP's meaning and implementation persists in product design conversations.
RERO, emphasizing frequent software releases for feedback, predates the MVP concept. Agile circles introduced MVP, defining it as the smallest product release adding value through rapid iteration and improvement.
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]