End majority jury verdicts to prevent more justice horror', says Malkinson
Briefly

Andrew Malkinson highlights the detrimental impact of majority verdicts on his life, emphasizing the need for reintroducing jury unanimity to prevent miscarriages of justice.
Malkinson expresses that being sent to prison based on a majority verdict is unacceptable and advocates for absolute unanimity in jury decisions to avoid unjust imprisonments.
Malkinson reflects on the agony of spending 17 years wrongfully imprisoned due to a majority verdict, emphasizing the need for a unanimous decision or no conviction at all.
Malkinson describes how the jury in his case was initially advised for a unanimous decision but ended up with a 10-2 majority verdict, causing prolonged deliberation and immense suffering.
Read at www.theguardian.com
[
add
]
[
|
|
]